| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This bugs was exposed by using rackunit, where all the output of, say,
check-eq? was lost for good (it was being sent to the stderr black
hole).
Hat tip Grant Retkke.
|
|
And we take the chance to lightly document the existence of this
new command in the user manual.
|
|
We now display procedure signatures in module help, and keep a cache
in Guile, using procedure properties.
|
|
Spinning up from correct fontification of [else in this brave Racket
world.
I'm keeping the list of extra keywords lean and mean, but making it
customizable in both Racket and Guile.
|
|
Separate connections for the REPL and Geiser commands was kind of
neat, but it had the problem of synchronising the current namespace
for both connections. A quick fix would have been to ask the scheme
for the current namespace for every Geiser command in the REPL, but
that, besides clunky, would add potentially prohibitive overhead for
(real) remote connections.
As it happens, using a single connection turned out to be not that
difficult and relatively clean code-wise. We could even turn back to
not use inferior schemes, and the net result of this refactoring would
be the replacement of comint-redirect (which wasn't able to match the
whole EOT token if it didn't arrive all at once) by transaction queues
(which also makes geiser-connection's implementation cleaner).
But using an inferior scheme has a dog-food value, and allows external
processes to connect to the scheme being used by Geiser without
further ado, which could be useful for debugging (although this is a
lame excuse: nothing prevents you from starting a REPL server from
emacs if you want). We'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Much more robust: dynamic-require might not have been defined in the
REPL's namespace.
- Fixes #30347 as a side-effect: now all Geiser functions work with
typed scheme too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
