| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
As Stanisław Halik reported, autodoc was receiving a mlist (instead of
a list) as its argument when invoked in an R5RS context. Turns out we
were evaluating geiser-eval's arguments in the wrong context (the
procedure being applied and the arglist belong to the same namespace).
|
|
Thanks to Caleb Reach.
We were using current-input-port, which is not the right port in
graphical environments.
|
|
And we take the chance to lightly document the existence of this
new command in the user manual.
|
|
The catch here is that one cannot use #%variable-reference inside an
R5RS module, and, as a consequence, namespace->module-path-name was
failing badly. The solution is to take note of the module name being
entered before hand, and use that name in case of error (we could
actually use that name always, but then cheaters using Racket's enter!
would see an inconsistent name (which probably they deserve)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refreshing the cache on form evaluation (had been deactivated by error
since the introduction of meta-commands). The current behaviour is not
yet completely correct: if one evaluates a form in a modified buffer,
geiser won't notice the new definition's signature, not even after the
buffer is saved if one has gone around asking for autodoc before that.
An improvement would be to make the cache sensitive to file write
times, as suggested back in the day by Eli & Neil.
|
|
Spinning up from correct fontification of [else in this brave Racket
world.
I'm keeping the list of extra keywords lean and mean, but making it
customizable in both Racket and Guile.
|
|
Inferior schemes weren't really a good idea, were they? With remote
connections one can launch an external scheme to debug Geiser anyway.
And everything is (ahem, will be) simpler when we add new
implementations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
