diff options
author | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org> | 2017-07-02 03:27:12 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org> | 2017-07-02 03:27:12 +0200 |
commit | f5ae5488a6d94fcd74d573049b58f8c2e7ff7012 (patch) | |
tree | 4c0c1c0150ac00ff614dda3112961dec76ed9982 | |
parent | 99340355a2af2f2757349cd1cebd51dfcd4b1d5e (diff) | |
download | geiser-guile-f5ae5488a6d94fcd74d573049b58f8c2e7ff7012.tar.gz geiser-guile-f5ae5488a6d94fcd74d573049b58f8c2e7ff7012.tar.bz2 |
Fix for the fix for broken links
Actually, programming-musings.org is no longer a domain i pay for, and
the "canonical" reference to my blog post is in jaortega.wordpress.com.
-rw-r--r-- | doc/parens.texi | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/parens.texi b/doc/parens.texi index f4f44f8..26f0fd4 100644 --- a/doc/parens.texi +++ b/doc/parens.texi @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ uses of a macro after redefining it. That's not a limitation imposed by Geiser, but a consequence of how macros work in Scheme (and other Lisps). There's also the risk that you lose track of what's actually defined and what's not during a given session. But, -@uref{http://programming-musings.org/2009/03/29/from-my-cold-prying-hands/index.html, +@uref{http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/from-my-cold-prying-hands/index.html, in my opinion}, those are limitations we lispers are aware of, and they don't force us to throw the baby with the bathwater and ditch incremental evaluation. Some people disagree; if you happen to find |