diff options
author | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org> | 2015-09-10 04:22:10 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org> | 2015-09-10 04:22:10 +0200 |
commit | 58484400fd3dde3ec28057159ce55f22fcb6c919 (patch) | |
tree | 7ec81bca6d63c4afeca8f10c1b0ac19f8f033a67 /geiser/completion.scm | |
parent | 2f91e2e4efc776a3b8808c534491edaea6642f93 (diff) | |
download | geiser-guile-58484400fd3dde3ec28057159ce55f22fcb6c919.tar.gz geiser-guile-58484400fd3dde3ec28057159ce55f22fcb6c919.tar.bz2 |
Speeding up debugger check (addresses #64)
Soooo, the long delay experienced when evaluating long string lists in
Guile had nothing to do with the time took by emacs to read the response
from the scheme process; that process is always a breeze, no matter or
its format or number of newlines. The delay was provoked by an innocent
looking function that scans the received string (which includes a prompt
at the end as an EOT marker) to check whether Guile (or any other
scheme) has just entered the debugger (that's done inside
`geiser-con--connection-update-debugging`). For some reason,
`string-match` on that kind of string using Guile's regexp for a debug
prompt takes forever. Instead of trying to optimize the regular
expression, i've just applied it to the *second* line of the received
string, which is the one that contains the response's prompt.
Diffstat (limited to 'geiser/completion.scm')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions