Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
Exposes geiser-load-paths, makes add-to-load-path and find-file
'unsafe'. Those needn't be memoized and would be strange if they are.
This should finish fixing jaor/geiser#114
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was annoying.
|
|
|
|
If one were to re-evaluate a buffer with a module in it there would be
problems because it would appear as a nested request.
Solution:
- Check if a module definition is a fore-most request, and if so,
evaluate at top level
|
|
If literals were present chicken wouldn't provide any autodocumentation
due to an error. Module evaluation was failing due to poor
input. Chicken's Error output was failing to parse
- Filter out all non-symbols from the autodoc set
- Properly escape module names
- Add "Error" to the set of accepted error prefixes
|
|
|
|
Fixes #95. This is @kovrik's patch, with 80-columns max formatting.
|
|
|
|
Should fix #105
|
|
Seems this site is updated better than the canonical
download.savannah.gnu.org (which depends on mirror propagation).
|
|
|
|
Fixed by using font-lock-ensure instead
|
|
Mainly by reordering definitions so that functions are not used before
defined. There are a couple of places where the compiler and I
disagree (it complains withing eval-after-load), and a valid complain
about functions defined via geiser-popup--define that should be
addressed).
|
|
|
|
It doesn't make sense to memoize the following:
geiser-start-server
geiser-macroexpand
|
|
Removed the unnecessary csi reference
Added a flag to force build an so
|
|
|
|
Clears memo when anything other than a safe geiser call is made.
Removes the last calls to regex within the thing
|
|
This seems to improve speed; in a large environment I witnessed a
regular 100ms increase in speed for autodoc.
|
|
Improves speed by an order of magnitude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
API for test suites is defined by SRFI-64.
|
|
Exceptions are defined by R6RS, SRFI-18 and SRFI-34.
|
|
I kind of dislike completion on symbols, because a quote reads to me as
'stop evaluating', and a symbol per se has infinite possible
conversions. But, on the other hand, not completing has no practical
advantage, and, moreover, we're already completing symbols inside quoted
lists (e.g. try M-TAB next to `'(defi`)), so my prejudices are not even
consistent. So here we go!
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Also adds page breaks to geiser-chicken.el
|
|
Move general indentation rules to "geiser-syntax".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move general RNRS/SRFI keywords from "geiser-chicken" to "geiser-syntax".
|
|
Use this function instead of repeating the same code in each
implementation.
|
|
Many chickeners use prefixes when importing eggs, which breaks
completions. This commit adds the ability to define custom prefix
delimiters, with : and # pre-defined due to their common usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crunch is a subset of R5RS that the crunch egg can heavily optimize via
c++ compilation. This change allows geiser to report to chicken
programmers whether the function is found within that subset, easing
development.
Details on the crunch egg can be found at:
http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/crunch
|
|
|
|
Soooo, the long delay experienced when evaluating long string lists in
Guile had nothing to do with the time took by emacs to read the response
from the scheme process; that process is always a breeze, no matter or
its format or number of newlines. The delay was provoked by an innocent
looking function that scans the received string (which includes a prompt
at the end as an EOT marker) to check whether Guile (or any other
scheme) has just entered the debugger (that's done inside
`geiser-con--connection-update-debugging`). For some reason,
`string-match` on that kind of string using Guile's regexp for a debug
prompt takes forever. Instead of trying to optimize the regular
expression, i've just applied it to the *second* line of the received
string, which is the one that contains the response's prompt.
|
|
This one should address #79. I'm very surprised this ever worked!
|
|
That way we avoid circularities in the load graph, always a good thing.
|
|
This is gone now, since we're diligent enough to always end our impl
definitions with an explicit provide form. See PR #87 for a bit of
discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should fix issue #85
|