geiser/elisp, branch 0.12emacs and scheme talk to each otherhttps://jao.io/cgit/geiser/atom?h=0.122020-07-12T07:19:53ZAlways display error in minibuffer after eval2020-07-12T07:19:53ZAaron Marksnymacro@gmail.com2020-07-12T07:14:22Zurn:sha1:1e3cb03c7685561ff41c4d39ab85b4ef8462077c
When evaluating expressions in a Scheme buffer, display the error
of an evaluation in the minibuffer regardless of whether
`geiser-debug-show-debug-p` or `geiser-debug-jump-to-debug-p` are
set or not.
Tag project functions instead of overriding docs2020-07-06T20:12:33ZAndrew Whatsonwhatson@gmail.com2020-06-19T13:52:46Zurn:sha1:fc81121015f43709abf9dc4d623e26fdb45cae3aFix byte-compiler warning2020-07-06T20:12:33ZAndrew Whatsonwhatson@gmail.com2020-06-19T13:48:52Zurn:sha1:01f1d479cbeb4cf1b0a908c363366e0c6100eea9Improve project function selection, make ignore default2020-07-06T20:12:33ZAndrew Whatsonwhatson@gmail.com2020-06-19T13:32:45Zurn:sha1:8cba6b5ea04c9a4c8473944aa1d0a6be78e78c66Refactor to make repl/impl proj argument optional2020-07-06T20:12:33ZAndrew Whatsonwhatson@gmail.com2020-06-19T06:44:54Zurn:sha1:210068c7d552c35b958f0647bbb5bfa3cb8e4726Use a separate REPL instance per project2020-07-06T20:12:33ZAndrew Whatsonwhatson@gmail.com2020-06-19T03:56:09Zurn:sha1:daa8236bd7b133af8fce5b11e8f3da1c6776a6c1Returning C-c k back to users, that key's theirs!2020-07-06T18:34:09ZJose Antonio Ortega Ruizjao@gnu.org2020-07-06T18:34:09Zurn:sha1:2b73504c1df942a30309d0135cb0ab59c8b5fa70
Should close issue #315, where it is pointed out that "sequences
consisting of `C-c` and a letter (either upper or lower case) are
reserved for users; they are the *only* sequences reserved for users,
so do not block them."
Better handcrafted reader, now with numbers!2020-05-10T18:11:04ZJose Antonio Ortega Ruizjao@gnu.org2020-05-10T18:11:04Zurn:sha1:ff17a4382eb77558fc7e00ef64893acad6c0f93d
For no good reason, we were transforming numbers in retorts to symbols
and then failing to recognise things like line or column numbers
there.
The "fix" here only works for the intersection of numbers that are
written in the same way in elisp and scheme; one day we'll find a
situation where this doesn't cut it, but right now we only really use
integers.
Completion for vanilla users2020-05-10T16:28:00ZJose Antonio Ortega Ruizjao@gnu.org2020-05-10T16:28:00Zurn:sha1:c25a0562962c0f4dfbdc81b4662609f7df715b98
Restoring what seem reasonable definitions for the completion
functions when called away from the current buffer. Should fix issue
Fix typos2020-04-26T21:52:31ZJonas Bernoullijonas@bernoul.li2020-04-26T21:52:31Zurn:sha1:19f7f244a1afce95aa54618801848bfb2f218198