diff options
| author | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org> | 2020-06-26 22:23:51 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org> | 2020-06-26 22:23:51 +0100 |
| commit | 3d2062779ec91bbd702ed0d290630067f305d841 (patch) | |
| tree | b21868bdb2030bd48610de4d158f8a470d608f54 | |
| parent | 4835112569a3d093c7b2322af5312a8b4c59061b (diff) | |
| download | geiser-3d2062779ec91bbd702ed0d290630067f305d841.tar.gz geiser-3d2062779ec91bbd702ed0d290630067f305d841.tar.bz2 | |
Links to olde blog posts
Thanks to Sebastian, who noted this in issue #314
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/parens.texi | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/parens.texi b/doc/parens.texi index 55a23f7..118c020 100644 --- a/doc/parens.texi +++ b/doc/parens.texi @@ -429,11 +429,11 @@ uses of a macro after redefining it. That's not a limitation imposed by Geiser, but a consequence of how macros work in Scheme (and other Lisps). There's also the risk that you lose track of what's actually defined and what's not during a given session. But, -@uref{http://jaortega.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/from-my-cold-prying-hands/index.html, +@uref{https://jaortega.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/from-my-cold-prying-hands, in my opinion}, those are limitations we lispers are aware of, and they don't force us to throw the baby with the bathwater and ditch incremental evaluation. Some people disagree; if you happen to find -@uref{http://blog.racket-lang.org/2009/03/drscheme-repl-isnt-lisp-the-one-in-emacs.html, +@uref{https://blog.racket-lang.org/2009/03/the-drscheme-repl-isnt-the-one-in-emacs.html, their arguments} convincing, you don't have to throw away Geiser together with the baby: @kbd{M-x geiser-restart-repl} will let you restart the REPL as many times as you see fit. Moreover, you can invoke |