summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/fun.texi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org>2010-11-06 14:22:53 +0100
committerJose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org>2010-11-06 14:22:53 +0100
commitab8f059cc19d0a7d9f52a4374636f704a9887f1d (patch)
treea363e83909d1db9b664c5be74c335245156018f4 /doc/fun.texi
parent178a9175bf1ff7a268a3376a729cd7bc05dabd6d (diff)
downloadgeiser-ab8f059cc19d0a7d9f52a4374636f704a9887f1d.tar.gz
geiser-ab8f059cc19d0a7d9f52a4374636f704a9887f1d.tar.bz2
Manual nits
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/fun.texi')
-rw-r--r--doc/fun.texi488
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 488 deletions
diff --git a/doc/fun.texi b/doc/fun.texi
deleted file mode 100644
index 08bdc33..0000000
--- a/doc/fun.texi
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,488 +0,0 @@
-@node Between the parens, Cheat sheet, The REPL, Top
-@chapter Between the parens
-
-A good @repl{} is a must, but just about half the story of a good Scheme
-hacking environment. Well, perhaps a bit more than a half; but, at any
-rate, one surely needs also a pleasant way of editing source code. Don't
-pay attention to naysayers: Emacs comes with an excellent editor
-included for about any language on Earth, and just the best one when
-that language is sexpy (specially if you use @ref{paredit,,Paredit}).
-Geiser's support for writing Scheme code adds to Emacs'
-@code{scheme-mode}, rather than supplanting it; and it does so by means
-of a minor mode (unimaginatively dubbed @code{geiser-mode}) that defines
-a bunch of new commands to try and, with the help of the same Scheme
-process giving you the @repl{}, make those Scheme buffers come to life.
-
-@menu
-* Activating Geiser::
-* The source and the REPL::
-* Documentation helpers::
-* To eval or not to eval::
-* To err perchance to debug::
-* Jumping around::
-* Geiser writes for you::
-@end menu
-
-@node Activating Geiser, The source and the REPL, Between the parens, Between the parens
-@section Activating Geiser
-
-@cindex geiser-mode
-@img{geiser-mode, right} With Geiser installed following any of the
-procedures described in @ref{Setting it up}, Emacs will automatically
-activate @i{geiser-mode} when opening a Scheme buffer. Geiser also
-instructs Emacs to consider files with the extension @file{rkt} part of
-the family, so that, in principle, there's nothing you need to do to
-ensure that Geiser's extensions will be available, out of the box, when
-you start editing Scheme code.
-
-Indications that everything is working according to plan include the
-'Geiser' minor mode indicator in your mode-line and the appearance of a
-new entry for Geiser in the menu bar. If, moreover, the mode-line
-indicator is the name of a Scheme implementation, you're indeed in a
-perfect world; otherwise, don't despair and keep on reading: i'll tell
-you how to fix that in a moment.
-
-@cindex geiser-mode commands
-The menu provides a good synopsis of everthing Geiser brings to the
-party, including those keyboard shortcuts we Emacsers love. If you're
-seeing the name of your favourite Scheme implementation in the
-mode-line, have a running @repl{} and are comfortable with Emacs, you
-can stop reading now and, instead, discover Geiser's joys by yourself.
-I've tried to make Geiser as self-documenting as any self-respecting
-Emacs package should be. If you follow this route, make sure to take a
-look at Geiser's customization buffers (@kbd{M-x customize-group
-@key{RET} geiser}): there's lot of fine tunning available there. You
-might also want to take a glance at the @ref{Cheat sheet}.
-
-Since @i{geiser-mode} is a minor mode, you can toggle it with
-@kbd{M-x geiser-mode}, and control its activation in hooks with the
-functions @code{turn-on-geiser-mode} and @code{turn-off-geiser-mode}.
-If, for some reason i cannot fathom, you prefer @i{geiser-mode} not
-to be active by default, the following elisp incantation will do the
-trick:
-@example
-(eval-after-load "geiser-mode"
- (remove-hook 'scheme-mode-hook 'turn-on-geiser-mode))
-@end example
-@cindex scheme file extensions
-And if you happen to use a funky extension for your Scheme files that is
-not recognised as such by Emacs, just tell her about it with:
-@example
-(add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("\\.funky-extension\\'" . scheme-mode))
-@end example
-
-@cindex useless wretch
-Now, @i{geiser-mode} is just a useless wretch unless there's a running
-Scheme process backing it up. Meaning that virtually all the commands it
-provides require a @repl{} up and running, preferably corresponding to
-the correct Scheme implementation. In the following section, we'll see
-how to make sure that that's actually the case.
-
-@node The source and the REPL, Documentation helpers, Activating Geiser, Between the parens
-@section The source and the REPL
-
-As i've already mentioned a couple of times, @i{geiser-mode} needs a
-running @repl{} to be operative. Thus, a common usage pattern will be
-for you to first call @code{run-geiser} (or one of its variants, see
-them described @ref{choosing-impl,,here}), and then open Scheme files;
-but there's nothing wrong in first opening a couple Scheme buffers and
-then starting the @repl{} (you can even find it more convenient, since
-pressing @kbd{C-c C-z} in a Scheme buffer will start the @repl{} for
-you). Since Geiser supports more than one Scheme implementation, though,
-there's the problem of knowing which of them is to be associated with
-each Scheme source file. Serviceable as it is, @i{geiser-mode} will try
-to guess the correct implementation for you, according to the algorithm
-described below. If you find that Geiser is already guessing right the
-Scheme implementation, feel free to skip to the
-@ref{switching-repl-buff,,next subsection}.
-
-@subsubheading How Geiser associates a REPL to your Scheme buffer
-@cindex scheme implementation, choosing
-To determine what Scheme implementation corresponds to a given source
-file, Geiser uses the following algorithm:
-@enumerate
-@item
-If the file-local variable @code{geiser-scheme-implementation} is
-defined, its value is used. A common way of setting buffer-local
-variables is to put them in a comment near the beginning of the file,
-surrounded by @code{-*-} marks, as in:
-@example
-;; -*- geiser-scheme-implementation: guile -*-
-@end example
-@item
-If you've customized @code{geiser-active-implementations} so that it's a
-single-element list (as explained @ref{choosing-impl,,here}), that
-element is used as the chosen implementation.
-@item
-The contents of the file is scanned for hints on its associated
-implementation. For instance, files that contain a @code{#lang}
-directive will be considered Racket source code, while those with a
-@code{define-module} form in them will be assigned to a Guile @repl{}.
-@item
-The current buffer's file name is checked against the rules given in
-@code{geiser-implementations-alist}, and the first match is applied. You
-can provide your own rules by customizing this variable, as explained
-below.
-@item
-If we haven't been lucky this far and you have customized
-@code{geiser-default-implementation} to the name of a supported
-implementation, we'll follow your lead.
-@item
-See? That's the problem of being a smart alec: one's always outsmarted
-by people around. At this point, @i{geiser-mode} will humbly give up and
-ask you to explicitly choose the Scheme implementation.
-@end enumerate
-As you can see in the list above, there are several ways to influence
-Geiser's guessing by mean customizable variables. The most direct (and
-most impoverishing) is probably limiting the active implementations to a
-single one, while customizing @code{geiser-implementations-alist} is the
-most flexible (and, unsurprisingly, also the most complex). Here's the
-default value for the latter variable:
-@example
-(((regexp "\\.scm$") guile)
- ((regexp "\\.ss$") racket)
- ((regexp "\\.rkt$") racket))
-@end example
-which describes the simple heuristic that files with @file{.scm} as
-extension are by default associated to a Guile @repl{} while those
-ending in @file{.ss} or @file{.rkt} correspond to Racket's
-implementation (with the caveat that these rules are applied only if the
-previous heuristics have failed to detect the correct implementation,
-and that they'll match only if the corresponding implementation is
-active). You can add rules to @code{geiser-implementations-alist} (or
-replace all of them) by customizing it. Besides regular expressions, you
-can also use a directory name; for instance, the following snippet:
-@example
-(eval-after-load "geiser-impl"
- '(add-to-list 'geiser-implementations-alist
- '((dir "/home/jao/prj/frob") guile)))
-@end example
-will add a new rule that says that any file inside my
-@file{/home/jao/prj/frob} directory (or, recursively, any of its
-children) is to be assigned to Guile. Since rules are first matched,
-first served, this new rule will take precedence over the default ones.
-
-@subsubheading Switching between source files and the REPL
-@cindex switching to REPL
-@cindex switching to source
-@anchor{switching-repl-buff} Once you have a working @i{geiser-mode},
-you can switch from Scheme source buffers to the @repl{} or @kbd{C-c
-C-z}. Those shortcuts map to the interactive command
-@code{switch-to-geiser}.
-
-@cindex switching to module
-If you use a numeric prefix, as in @kbd{C-u C-c C-z}, besides being
-teleported to the @repl{}, the latter will switch to the namespace of
-the Scheme source file (as if you had used @kbd{C-c C-m} in the @repl{},
-with the source file's module as argument; cf. @ref{Switching context}).
-This command is also bound to @kbd{C-c C-Z}, with a capital zed.
-
-Once you're in the @repl{}, the same @kbd{C-c C-z} shortcut will bring
-you back to the buffer you jumped from, provided you don't kill the
-Scheme process in between. This is why the command is called
-@i{switch-to-geiser} instead of @i{switch-to-repl}, and what makes it
-really handy, if you ask me.
-
-@cindex switching schemes
-If for some reason you're not happy with the Scheme implementation that
-Geiser has assigned to your file, you can change it with @kbd{C-c C-s},
-and probably take a look at @ref{switching-repl-buff,,the previous
-subsection} to make sure that Geiser doesn't get confused again.
-
-@subsubheading A note about context
-As explained before (@pxref{Modus operandi}), all Geiser activities take
-place in the context of the @i{current namespace}, which, for Scheme
-buffers, corresponds to the module that the Scheme implementation
-associates to the source file at hand (for instance, in Racket, there's
-a one to one correspondence between paths and modules, while Guile
-relies on explicit @code{define-module} forms in the source file).
-
-Now that we have @code{geiser-mode} happily alive in our Scheme buffers
-and communicating with the right @repl{} instance, let us see what it
-can do for us, besides jumping to and fro.
-
-@node Documentation helpers, To eval or not to eval, The source and the REPL, Between the parens
-@section Documentation helpers
-
-@subsubheading Autodoc redux
-
-@cindex autodoc, in scheme buffers
-The first thing you will notice by moving around Scheme source is that,
-every now and then, the echo area lightens up with the same autodoc
-messages we know and love from our @repl{} forays. This happens every
-time the Scheme process is able to recognise an identifier in the
-buffer, and provide information either on its value (for variables) or
-on its arity and the name of its formal arguments (for procedures and
-macros). That information will only be available if the module the
-identifier belongs to has been loaded in the running Scheme image. So it
-can be the case that, at first, no autodoc is shown for identifiers
-defined in the file you're editing. But as soon as you evaluate them
-(either individually or collectively using any of the devices described
-in @ref{To eval or not to eval}) their signatures will start appearing
-in the echo area.
-
-@cindex disabling autodoc
-Autodoc activation is controlled by a minor mode, @code{geiser-autodoc},
-which you can toggle with @kbd{M-x geiser-autodoc}, or its associated
-keyboard shortcut, @kbd{C-c C-d a}. That @t{/A} indicator in the
-mode-line is telling you that autodoc is active. If you prefer, for some
-obscure reason, that it be inactive by default, just set
-@code{geiser-mode-autodoc-p} to @code{nil} in your customization files.
-
-@cindex autodoc explained
-@img{autodoc-req, right} The way autodoc displays information deserves
-some explanation. It will first show the name of the module where the
-identifier at hand is defined, followed by a colon and the identifier
-itself. If the latter corresponds to a procedure or macro, it will be
-followed by a list of argument names, starting with the ones that are
-required. Then there comes a square-bracketed list of optional argument
-names, if any. When an optional argument has a default value (or a form
-defining its default value), instead of a plain name, autodoc will
-display a list with the name followed by its initialisation form. When
-the optional arguments are keywords, their names are prefixed with a
-colon. An ellipsis (@dots{}) servers as a marker of an indeterminated
-number of parameters, as is the case with @i{rest} arguments or when
-autodoc cannot fathom the exact number of arguments (this is often the
-case with macros defined using @code{syntax-case}). Another way in which
-autodoc displays its ignorance is by using and underscore to display
-parameters whose name is beyond its powers.
-
-@img{autodoc-multi, right} It can also be the case that a function or
-macro has more than one signature (e.g., functions defined using
-@code{case-lambda}, or some @code{syntax-rules} macros, for which Geiser
-has often the black magic necessary to retrieve their actual arities).
-In those cases, autodoc shows all known signatures (using the above
-rules for each one) separated by a vertical bar (|). As you have already
-noticed, the whole thing is enclosed in parenthesis. After all, we're
-talking about Scheme here.
-
-@cindex autodoc for variables
-@img{autodoc-var, right} Finally, life is much easier when your cursor
-is on a symbol corresponding to a plain variable: you'll see in the echo
-area its name, preceded by the module where it's defined, and followed
-by its value, with an intervening arrow for greater effect. This time,
-there are no enclosing parenthesis (i hope you see the logic in my
-madness).
-
-@cindex autodoc customized
-You can change the way Geiser displays the module/identifier combo by
-customizing @code{geiser-autodoc-identifier-format}. For example, if you
-wanted a tilde surrounded by spaces instead of a colon as a separator,
-you would write something like
-@example
-(setq geiser-autodoc-identifier-format "%s ~ %s")
-@end example
-in your Emacs initialization files. There's also a face
-(@code{geiser-font-lock-autodoc-identifier}) that you can customize (for
-instance, with @kbd{M-x customize-face}) to change the appearance of the
-text. And another one (@code{geiser-font-lock-autodoc-current-arg}) that
-controls how the current argument position is highlighted.
-
-@subsubheading Other documentation commands
-
-Sometimes, autodoc won't provide enough information for you to
-understand what a function does. In those cases, you can ask Geiser to
-ask the running Scheme for further information on a given identifier or
-module.
-
-@cindex documentation for symbol
-@cindex docstrings, maybe
-For symbols, the incantation is @kbd{M-x geiser-doc-symbol-at-point}, or
-@kbd{C-c C-d C-d} for short. If the associated scheme supports
-docstrings (as, for instance, Guile does), you'll be teleported to a new
-Emacs buffer displaying Geiser's documentation browser, filled with
-information about the identifier, including its docstring (if any;
-unfortunately, that an implementation supports docstrings doesn't mean
-that they're used everywhere).
-
-@imgc{docstring}
-
-Pressing @kbd{q} in the documentation buffer will bring you back,
-enlightened, to where you were. There's also a handful of other
-navigation commands available in that buffer, which you can discover by
-means of its menu or via the good old @kbd{C-h m} command.
-
-For Racket, which does not support docstrings out of the box, this
-command will invoke Racket's @code{help} procedure, thereby opening your
-configured web browser with the corresponding manual page for you to
-peruse.
-
-You can also ask Geiser to display information about a module, in the
-form of a list of its exported identifiers, using @kbd{C-c C-d C-m},
-exactly as you would do @ref{repl-mod,,in the REPL}. This commands works
-with all supported Schemes, no strings attached.
-
-@node To eval or not to eval, To err perchance to debug, Documentation helpers, Between the parens
-@section To eval or not to eval
-
-@cindex philosophy
-@cindex incremental development
-One of Geiser's main goals is to facilitate incremental development. You
-might have noticed that i've made a big fuss of Geiser's ability to
-recognize context, by being aware of the namespace where its operations
-happen.
-
-That awareness is specially important when evaluating code in your
-scheme buffers, using the commands described below. They allow you to
-send code to the running Scheme with a granularity ranging from whole
-files to single s-expressions. That code will be evaluated in the module
-associated with the file you're editing, allowing you to redefine values
-and procedures to your heart's (and other modules') content.
-
-@cindex incremental development, evil
-Macros are, of course, another kettle of fish: one needs to re-evaluate
-uses of a macro after redefining it. That's not a limitation imposed by
-Geiser, but a consequence of how macros work in Scheme (and other
-Lisps). There's also the risk that you lose track of what's actually
-defined and what's not during a given session. But,
-@uref{http://programming-musings.org/2009/03/29/from-my-cold-prying-hands/,in
-my opinion}, those are limitations we lispers are aware of, and they
-don't force us to throw the baby with the bathwater and ditch
-incremental evaluation. Some people disagree; if you happen to find
-@uref{http://blog.racket-lang.org/2009/03/drscheme-repl-isnt-lisp.html,
-their arguments} convincing, you don't have to throw away Geiser
-together with the baby: @kbd{M-x geiser-restart-repl} will let you
-restart the @repl{} as many times as you see fit.
-
-@cindex evaluation
-@cindex incremental development, not evil
-For all of you bearded old lispers still with me, here are some of the
-commands performing incremental evaluation in Geiser.
-
-@code{geiser-eval-last-sexp}, bound to @kbd{C-x C-e}, will eval the
-s-expression just before point.
-
-@code{geiser-eval-definition}, bound to @kbd{C-M-x}, finds the topmost
-definition containing point and sends it for evaluation. The variant
-@code{geiser-eval-definition-and-go} (@kbd{C-c M-e}) works in the same
-way, but it also teleports you to @repl{} after the evaluation.
-
-@code{geiser-eval-region}, bound to @kbd{C-c C-r}, evals the current
-region. Again, there's an @i{and go} version available,
-@code{geiser-eval-region-and-go}, bound to @kbd{C-c M-r}.
-
-For all the commands above, the result of the evaluation is displayed in
-the minibuffer, unless it causes a (scheme-side) error (@pxref{To err
-perchance to debug}).
-
-At the risk of repeating myself, i'll remember you that all these
-evaluations will take place in the namespace of the module corresponding
-to the Scheme file from which you're sending your code, which, in
-general, will be different from the @repl{}'s current module. And, if
-all goes according to plan, (re)defined variables and procedures should
-be immediately visible inside and, if exported, outside their module.
-
-Besides evaluating expressions, definitions and regions, you can also
-macro-expand them. The corresponding keybindings start with the prefix
-@kbd{C-c C-m} and end, respectively, with @kbd{C-e}, @kbd{C-x} and
-@kbd{C-r}. The result of the macro expansion always appears in a pop up
-buffer.
-
-@node To err perchance to debug, Jumping around, To eval or not to eval, Between the parens
-@section To err: perchance to debug
-
-@cindex to err is schemey
-@cindex backtraces
-When an error occurs during evaluation, it will be reported according to
-the capabilities of the underlying Scheme REPL.
-
-@cindex error buffer
-In Racket, you'll be presented with a backtrace, in a new buffer where
-file paths locating the origin of the error are clickable (you can
-navigate them using the @key{TAB} key, and use @key{RET} or the mouse to
-jump to the offending spot; or invoke Emacs' stock commands
-@code{next-error} and @code{previous-error}, bound to @kbd{M-g n} and
-@kbd{M-g p} by default).
-
-@imgc{eval-error}
-
-The Racket backtrace also highlights the exception type, making it
-clickable. Following the link will open the documentation corresponding
-to said exception type. Both the error and exception link faces are
-customizable (@code{geiser-font-lock-error-link} and
-@code{geiser-font-lock-doc-link}).
-
-On the other hand, Guile's reaction to evaluation errors is different:
-it enters the debugger in its REPL. Accordingly, the REPL buffer will
-pop up if your evaluation fails in a Guile file, and the error message
-and backtrace will be displayed in there, again clickable and all. But
-there you have the debugger at your disposal, with the REPL's current
-module set to that of the offender, and a host of special debugging
-commands that are described in Guile's fine documentation.
-
-@imgc{guile-eval-error}
-
-In addition, Guile will sometimes report warnings for otherwise
-successful evaluations. In those cases, it won't enter the debugger, and
-Geiser will report the warnings in a debug buffer, as it does for
-Racket. You can control how picky Guile is reporting warnings by
-customizing the variable @code{geiser-guile-warning-level}, whose
-detailed docstring (which see, using, e.g. @kbd{C-h v}) allows me to
-offer no further explanation here. The customization group
-@i{geiser-guile} is also worth a glance, for a couple of options to fine
-tune how Geiser interacts with Guile's debugger (and more). Same thing
-for racketeers and @i{geiser-racket}.
-
-@node Jumping around, Geiser writes for you, To err perchance to debug, Between the parens
-@section Jumping around
-
-@cindex jumping in scheme buffers
-This one feature is as sweet as easy to explain: @kbd{M-.}
-(@code{geiser-edit-symbol-at-point}) will open the file where the
-identifier around point is defined and land your point on its
-definition. To return to where you were, press @kbd{M-,}
-(@code{geiser-pop-symbol-stack}). This command works also for module
-names: Geiser first tries to locate a definition for the identifier at
-point and, if that fails, a module with that name; if the latter
-succeeds, the file where the module is defined will pop up.
-
-Sometimes, the underlying Scheme will tell Geiser only the file where
-the symbol is defined, but Geiser will use some heuristics (read,
-regular expressions) to locate the exact line and bring you there. Thus,
-if you find Geiser systematically missing your definitions, send a
-message to the mailing list and we'll try to make the algorithm smarter.
-
-@cindex jumping customized
-You can control how the destination buffer pops up by setting
-@code{geiser-edit-symbol-method} to either @code{nil} (to open the file
-in the current window), @code{'window} (other window in the same frame)
-or @code{'frame} (in a new frame).
-
-@node Geiser writes for you, , Jumping around, Between the parens
-@section Geiser writes for you
-
-@cindex completion in scheme buffers
-No self-respecting programming mode would be complete without
-completion. In geiser-mode, identifier completion is bound to
-@kbd{M-@key{TAB}}, and will offer all visible identifiers starting with
-the prefix before point. Visible here means all symbols imported or
-defined in the current namespace plus locally bound ones. E.g., if
-you're at the end of the following partial expression:
-
-@example
-(let ((default 42))
- (frob def
-@end example
-
-and press @kbd{M-@key{TAB}}, one of the possible completions will be
-@code{default}.
-
-@cindex smart tabs
-If you find the @kbd{M} modifier annoying, you always have the option to
-activate @code{geiser-smart-tab-mode}, which will make the @key{TAB} key
-double duty as the regular Emacs indentation command (when the cursor is
-not near a symbol) and Geiser's completion function. If you want this
-smarty pants mode always on in Scheme buffers, customize
-@code{geiser-mode-smart-tab-p} to @code{t}.
-
-@cindex completion for module names
-Geiser also knows how to complete module names: if no completion for the
-prefix at point is found among the currently visible bindings, it will
-try to find a module name that matches it. You can also request
-explicitly completion only over module names using @kbd{M-`} (that's a
-backtick).
-
-@c Local Variables:
-@c mode: texinfo
-@c TeX-master: "geiser"
-@c End: