| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
It's the convention and by following it we make a big step towards
supporting outline navigation.
The convention doesn't say much about what parts of the code are
supposed to be part of that sections and what parts belong in a
subsequent section. Here we put the `require' forms in this section
and maybe some setup code, that's a popular approach.
In most cases there was " " where we now insert "Code:". They both
serve a similar purpose and we keep the former because some users
depend on that for navigation. We even add this " " in libraries
where it previously was missing.
In some cases the permission statement was followed by a commentary,
which obviously does not belong in the "Code:" section. In such cases
add the conventional "Commentary:" section.
|
|
It's the convention and by following it we make a big step towards
supporting outline navigation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... so that we don't interfere with other active backends, and following
the same policy as in the rest of company-mode geiser methods. See also
the discussion in github's #173.
|
|
company-backends should not be overridden by modes, as users may have
additional backends that they wish to use. The appropriate behaviour is
to add your backend to the company-backends list.
Also removed the overriding of what ought to be user-controlled variables.
|
|
Which moreover complies with the unwritten naming conventions we use:
geiser-doc--render-docstring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We were not handling properly mixing id and module names
completion. In Guile, it's a lost cause, because module names are not
identifiers and, therefore, don't share prefixes. In Racket, things
are nicer in that respect: there we can offer both at once. In Guile,
one at least has (thanks to this patch, too) M-`.
|
|
i hope the anonymous reporter will check this...
|
|
|
|
These ones seem safe: the resulting symbol is not compared for
equality anywhere.
|
|
This reverts commit 801422d1558f488059ede4f9abab5163ca610900.
We cannot blindly substitute make-symbol for intern in the scheme
reader, because we rely on symbol equality elsewhere, often. The fix
will have to be much more careful.
|
|
We were calling `intern' instead of `make-symbol', polluting emacs'
obarray.
|
|
Besides removing code i didn't understand that well, we bring in
goodies such as partial completion. Jolly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
