| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11-13 | Superior schemes | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz | |
| Inferior schemes weren't really a good idea, were they? With remote connections one can launch an external scheme to debug Geiser anyway. And everything is (ahem, will be) simpler when we add new implementations. | |||
| 2010-11-12 | Hiding a bit inferior scheme buffers | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz | |
| By prefixing their name with a space... an argument against inferior schemes, btw, is that they raise the barrier to entry for new schemes: they must provide a networked REPL server. | |||
| 2010-11-12 | Nits | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz | |
| 2010-11-11 | Racket reconnected | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz | |
| 2010-11-11 | Elisp support for inferior schemes | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz | |
| 2010-11-11 | Partial work (connections working) | Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz | |
 |
index : geiser | |
| emacs and scheme talk to each other | jao |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff |