| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Should close issue #315, where it is pointed out that "sequences
consisting of `C-c` and a letter (either upper or lower case) are
reserved for users; they are the *only* sequences reserved for users,
so do not block them."
|
|
For no good reason, we were transforming numbers in retorts to symbols
and then failing to recognise things like line or column numbers
there.
The "fix" here only works for the intersection of numbers that are
written in the same way in elisp and scheme; one day we'll find a
situation where this doesn't cut it, but right now we only really use
integers.
|
|
Restoring what seem reasonable definitions for the completion
functions when called away from the current buffer. Should fix issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starting with Emacs 27 cl is fully deprecated, including at
compile-time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's the convention and by following it we make a big step towards
supporting outline navigation.
The convention doesn't say much about what parts of the code are
supposed to be part of that sections and what parts belong in a
subsequent section. Here we put the `require' forms in this section
and maybe some setup code, that's a popular approach.
In most cases there was " " where we now insert "Code:". They both
serve a similar purpose and we keep the former because some users
depend on that for navigation. We even add this " " in libraries
where it previously was missing.
In some cases the permission statement was followed by a commentary,
which obviously does not belong in the "Code:" section. In such cases
add the conventional "Commentary:" section.
|
|
It's the convention and by following it we make a big step towards
supporting outline navigation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A similar idea should probably be used with other schemes, but right
now i feel ashamed of having taken so long to fix this one (assuming
it's fixed!), so let's rush this commit for a change.
|
|
Thanks a lot Sean Delvin for a great bug report which, moreover,
contained the solution to the problem! (even though i'm risking a
small modification).
|
|
|
|
Repeat with me: try M-x geiser-reload before pushing to gitlab
|
|
With a hat tip to Mikhail Kryshen, who was wondering in guile-user why
oh why, and rightly so.
|
|
* Renames geiser-repl-context-sensitive-send to
geiser-repl-send-on-return-p. This option's value is now inverted.
* Update documentation accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seems we forgot a require while adding a new defcustom in geiser-log.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (chibi filesystem) import to geiser.sld
|
|
|
|
Add a helper function make-location to chibi interface.
|
|
See discussion in issue !256.
|
|
This option allows for easier editing of expressions on the REPL
without accidentally sending the input to the inferior Scheme.
When turned on, the REPL behaves similarly to the Chez REPL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Narrow font-lock syntax highlighting to only the
active REPL input region.
* Mark REPL output read-only. This can be changed via the
option `geiser-repl-read-only-output-p`.
* Mark REPL output with a user-definable face as
`geiser-font-lock-repl-output`.
Alternatively an option to syntax highlight REPL output
is provided via the option `geiser-repl-highlight-output-p`.
This applies scheme-mode syntax highlighting to any REPL
output. Any additional hooks defined via scheme-mode-hook
are also executed for highlighting this region.
* Remove some unwanted TABs in source files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since this job is done in the process sentinel, the clean up is also
triggered when the Scheme process exits unexpectedly, deleting any
traces the dying guy might have left. I added a flag to control the
behaviour, but upon reflection the old behaviour seems wrong and i've
defaulted to the new one. This one should fix #251.
|
|
And we also take the chance to let add-to-list do its job of not
adding duplicates.
|
|
Okay, i must confess it's sometimes handy to restart the REPL before
compiling a file (the proverbial clean slate and all). And we already
have geiser-restart-repl, so combining the two things when C-u happens
was not really difficult.
|
|
Looks like the arity of that function changed at some point between 24
and 25. It also looks like people still use emacs 24 (see issue #236),
so here we go.
|
|
When constructing the completion table for minibuffer prompts via
`completion-table-dynamic', we were forgetting to tell emacs to
perform the completion lookup with the original (scheme) buffer as its
current buffer. As a result, the actual completion function wasn't
able to find the REPL connection and everything when down in flames
with an exception.
|
