| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When using a prompt regexp, comint's version of these commands
misbehave (they try to reuse forward-paragraph, and that's not quite
it), so we're implemeting our own here in a very straightforward way.
We also bind the usual C-c C-p and C-c C-n to them. It only remains to
b seen whether advising the original ones is worth the trouble.
|
|
|
|
This one should fix github's issue #132. There's still the glitch that
scheme strings are fontified without taking into account extra keywords.
|
|
Addresses github's #158, and its implementation is really easy (kudos to
fice-t, also for telling me about bound-and-true-p).
|
|
We were adding only the scheme-specific ones.
|
|
We were doing it before the buffer's implementation, and the
implementation-specific keywords were not found. Should fix github's
issue #159.
|
|
Let's see if i finally got this right...
|
|
I wonder if this has ever worked fine: geiser-debug--display-retort was
a little mess. It should be a bit better now, but Guile is still
displaying funny messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This fixes a regression introduced by commit
424553e017718c54e219212b27a32b341ec6bd28.
|
|
This is a fix similar to the one made in commit
8e75455dfbd46355d777c26366e7ccfcb59ace20.
|
|
|
|
Avoid calling 'geiser-con--request-string' twice by wrapping it into
'let'.
|
|
This fixes 2 issues:
1. Reconnecting to a remote process prompts for host/port, although it
is not needed.
2. 'geiser-connect' should be used only if 'geiser-repl--address' is a
host/port pair. When it is a socket file name,
'geiser-connect-local' should be used.
|
|
company-backends should not be overridden by modes, as users may have
additional backends that they wish to use. The appropriate behaviour is
to add your backend to the company-backends list.
Also removed the overriding of what ought to be user-controlled variables.
|
|
As patiently pointed out by Alex Kost in the discussion of issue #121,
using the macro defined by the geiser-popup--define macro before its
actual definition causes problems when geiser is loaded after
compilation. Thanks again, Alex and Federico.
|
|
Move prompting for a socket file name to the interactive form.
|
|
|
|
If literals were present chicken wouldn't provide any autodocumentation
due to an error. Module evaluation was failing due to poor
input. Chicken's Error output was failing to parse
- Filter out all non-symbols from the autodoc set
- Properly escape module names
- Add "Error" to the set of accepted error prefixes
|
|
Should fix #105
|
|
Fixed by using font-lock-ensure instead
|
|
Mainly by reordering definitions so that functions are not used before
defined. There are a couple of places where the compiler and I
disagree (it complains withing eval-after-load), and a valid complain
about functions defined via geiser-popup--define that should be
addressed).
|
|
|
|
API for test suites is defined by SRFI-64.
|
|
Exceptions are defined by R6RS, SRFI-18 and SRFI-34.
|
|
Move general indentation rules to "geiser-syntax".
|
|
Move general RNRS/SRFI keywords from "geiser-chicken" to "geiser-syntax".
|
|
Use this function instead of repeating the same code in each
implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soooo, the long delay experienced when evaluating long string lists in
Guile had nothing to do with the time took by emacs to read the response
from the scheme process; that process is always a breeze, no matter or
its format or number of newlines. The delay was provoked by an innocent
looking function that scans the received string (which includes a prompt
at the end as an EOT marker) to check whether Guile (or any other
scheme) has just entered the debugger (that's done inside
`geiser-con--connection-update-debugging`). For some reason,
`string-match` on that kind of string using Guile's regexp for a debug
prompt takes forever. Instead of trying to optimize the regular
expression, i've just applied it to the *second* line of the received
string, which is the one that contains the response's prompt.
|
|
This one should address #79. I'm very surprised this ever worked!
|
|
That way we avoid circularities in the load graph, always a good thing.
|
|
This is gone now, since we're diligent enough to always end our impl
definitions with an explicit provide form. See PR #87 for a bit of
discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should fix issue #85
|
|
|
