summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/elisp/geiser-version.el.in
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org>2015-09-10 04:22:10 +0200
committerJose Antonio Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org>2015-09-10 04:22:10 +0200
commit0db9d5c26a82ee5f318655719ceb7d4bea8f74a7 (patch)
treed87a5b3de8e9d2749f6b949cad8c008d2946af9f /elisp/geiser-version.el.in
parent4c9dddb1a668a7a5cbac217c45558ad5e419cc9d (diff)
downloadgeiser-0db9d5c26a82ee5f318655719ceb7d4bea8f74a7.tar.gz
geiser-0db9d5c26a82ee5f318655719ceb7d4bea8f74a7.tar.bz2
Speeding up debugger check (addresses #64)
Soooo, the long delay experienced when evaluating long string lists in Guile had nothing to do with the time took by emacs to read the response from the scheme process; that process is always a breeze, no matter or its format or number of newlines. The delay was provoked by an innocent looking function that scans the received string (which includes a prompt at the end as an EOT marker) to check whether Guile (or any other scheme) has just entered the debugger (that's done inside `geiser-con--connection-update-debugging`). For some reason, `string-match` on that kind of string using Guile's regexp for a debug prompt takes forever. Instead of trying to optimize the regular expression, i've just applied it to the *second* line of the received string, which is the one that contains the response's prompt.
Diffstat (limited to 'elisp/geiser-version.el.in')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions